Trailer ó The Fall of France: The Nazi Invasion of 1940 PDF by ò Julian T. Jackson

Trailer ó The Fall of France: The Nazi Invasion of 1940 PDF by ò Julian T. Jackson The Fall Of France In Is One Of The Pivotal Moments Of The Twentieth Century If The German Invasion Of France Had Failed, It Is Arguable That The War Might Have Ended Right There But The French Suffered Instead A Dramatic And Humiliating Defeat, A Loss That Ultimately Drew The Whole World Into War This Exciting New Book By Julian Jackson, A Leading Historian Of Twentieth Century France, Charts The Breathtakingly Rapid Events That Led To The Defeat And Surrender Of One Of The Greatest Bastions Of The Western Allies Using Eyewitness Accounts, Memoirs, And Diaries To Bring The Story To Life, Jackson Not Only Recreates The Intense Atmosphere Of The Six Weeks In May And June Leading Up To The Establishment Of The Vichy Regime, But He Also Unravels The Historical Evidence To Produce A Fresh Answer To The Perennial Question Was The Fall Of France Inevitable Jackson S Vivid Narrative Explores The Errors Of France S Military Leaders, Her Inability To Create Stronger Alliances, The Political Infighting, The Lack Of Morale, Even The Decadence Of The Inter War Years He Debunks The Vast Superiority Of The German Army, Revealing That The Experienced French Troops Did Well In Battle Against The Germans Perhaps Than Anything Else, The Cause Of The Defeat Was The Failure Of The French To Pinpoint Where The Main Thrust Of The German Army Would Come, A Failure That Led Them To Put Their Best Soldiers Up Against A Feint, While Their Worst Troops Faced The Heart Of The German War Machine An Engaging And Authoritative Narrative, The Fall Of France Illuminates Six Weeks That Changed The Course Of Twentieth Century History Very good insight into many different factors leading up to the fall.
An interesting analysis of the fall of France in 1940 Jackson starts with 3 sections looking at the military, the politics and ordinary French people from 1930 to 1940 He then looks at some of the proposed explanations to see how they fit with the history hint most of them don t and provides his own conclusion The last section looks at the longer term consequences of the fall, both for the development of WWII and for the post war world.
An excellent study of the political, social, industrial, and military reasons for the collapse of France in 1940, only let down in my humble opinion by the latter chapters detailing post war France.
It s always been assumed that Nazi Germany s invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, was the pivotal moment of World War Two Considering the losses in men, material, and prestige, suffered by the Wehrmacht, it s hard to argue against thatAnd yet, Jackson does just that For Jackson, the pivotal moment of WW2 is not June 1941, but the fall of France in 1940 Widely considered to have the world s most powerful army, the defeat of France changed forever the strategic balance, transforming a European conflict, into a global one With France knocked out, Hitler could then fight the only war he ever wanted one against the Soviet Union With France still in the conflict, Hitler would never have made the mistake of fighting on two fronts, as the Germans did in the Great War France s defeat left Britain up the proverbial creek without a paddle Emboldened, Mussolini launched a campaign against Br Thorough but the writing is a little dry.
Not a detailed narrative of the Battle of France, but rather an analysis of one of the most shocking events of the 20th Century the collapse and surrender of France after six weeks of combat in 1940.
As makes sense of such a complex event, there is no single cause, but Jackson boils it down to a few problems 1 France was unprepared Though war had been declared almost nine months previously, the French military and government estimated that the Republic would not be ready for sustained military operations before 1941 French mobilization and production was beginning to bear fruit especially in warplanes in May 1940, but that proved to be too late.
2 French plans were deficient It s something of a cliche to argue that French commanders were preparing to re fight the First World War, but that is not exactly correct French equipment was in s read this about ten years ago and there are several excellent reviews Was the French army that bad, or were the Germans that good The answer to both questions is no Particular attention is paid here to the political environment in France between the wars Toxic is not an overstatement and you need only see political cartoons of the era for evidence France also suffered from a dearth of military leaders ready to take initiative Professor Jackson points out the vulnerability of the German flanks and how very few commanders made an effort to engage One of the few highlighted was Charles De Gaulle.
A particular point in the book I found compelling was how a relative few number of men, fairly well organized, were able to hold the Germans up at Sedan Had mobile forces been available to reinforce them rather than in Belgium , Jackson gives you the sense that the G A fine attempt by historian Julian Jackson to explain the failure of France s politicians and military in the years leading up to and during Nazi Germany s invasion and the subsequent collapse of the French army in 1940 Jackson is a leading authority on 20th Century France and in less than 300 pages manages to gives the reader a fascinating insight into the machinations of French politicians and military leaders, desperately trying to form alliances throughout Europe while trying to avoid all out war with Nazi Germany He shows that Germany was far from being militarily superior to the French Army, which despite popular myth battled valiantly to prevent defeat against a German invader which had the advantage of major surprise attacking the weakest sector in France s defences through the forests of The Ardennes and even a good d Great book, covering the historiography of the French defeat in 1940 and the various explanations given for it Military Jackson shows that the strategic plan and response of the French High Command were deeply flawed, but that many units gave good account of themselves.
Anglo French Alliance Very warm in 1940, but quickly deteriorated under the stress of defeatFrench defeatism overrated Mostly an immediate excuse for the failings of generals which served the Vichy governments retrenchment of the old order.
French political division the French right was slow in recognising that Hitler was a greater danger than the left French governments from 1936 tried to catch up, but faced difficult balancing act.
The defeat immediately became very much politicised under Vichy and remai

Julian T. Jackson

Trailer ó The Fall of France: The Nazi Invasion of 1940 PDF by ò Julian T. Jackson One of the leading authorities on twentieth century France, Julian Timothy Jackson is Professor of History at Queen Mary, University of London He was educated at the University of Cambridge where he obtained his doctorate in 1982, having been supervised by Professor Christopher Andrew After many years spent at the University of Wales, Swansea, he joined Queen Mary History Department in 2003 He